Robotics C++ Physics II AP Physics B Electronics Java Astronomy Other Courses Summer Session  

Solar Electric - Photovoltaics

 

 

Simplified Physics Connections to the Grid

 

 

File:Nellis AFB Solar panels.jpg

Nellis AFB - Panels track the sun on 1 axis


 

 

Sources of electricity
in the United States

 

Comparisons

Source

Advantages

Disadvantages

Coal
  • Inexpensive
  • Easy to recover (in U.S. and Russia)
  • Requires expensive air pollution controls (e.g. mercury, sulfur dioxide)
  • Significant contributor to acid rain and global warming
  • Requires extensive transportation system
Nuclear
  • Fuel is inexpensive
  • Energy generation is the most concentrated source
  • Waste is more compact than any source
  • Extensive scientific basis for the cycle
  • Easy to transport as new fuel
  • No greenhouse or acid rain effects
  • Requires larger capital cost because of emergency, containment, radioactive waste and storage systems
  • Requires resolution of the long-term high level waste storage issue in most countries
  • Potential nuclear proliferation issue
Hydroelectric
  • Very inexpensive once dam is built
  • Government has invested heavily in building dams, particularly in the Western U.S.
  • Very limited source since depends on water elevation
  • Many dams available are currently exist (not much of a future source[depends on country])
  • Dam collapse usually leads to loss of life
  • Dams have affected fish (e.g. salmon runs)
  • Environmental damage for areas flooded (backed up) and downstream
Gas / Oil
  • Good distribution system for current use levels
  • Easy to obtain (sometimes)
  • Better as space heating energy source
  • Very limited availability as shown by shortages during winters several years ago
  • Could be major contributor to global warming
  • Very expensive for energy generation
  • Large price swings with supply and demand
  • Liquified Natural Gas storage facilities and gas transmission systems have met opposition from environmentalists.
Wind
  • Wind is free if available. As it turns out, the US has many areas available.
  • Good source for periodic water pumping demands of farms as used earlier in 1900's
  • Generation and maintenance costs have decreased significantly. Wind is proving to be a reasonable cost renewable source.
  • Well suited to rural areas. Examples include Mid-Columbia areas of Oregon and Washington, western Minnesota, Atlantic Ocean off Cape Cod.
  • Need 3x the amount of installed generation to meet demand
  • Limited to windy areas.
  • Limited to small generator size; need many towers.
  • Highly climate dependent - wind can damage equipment during windstorms or not turn during still summer days.
  • May affect endangered birds, however tower design can reduce impact..
Solar
  • Sunlight is free when available
  • Costs are dropping.
  • Limited to southern areas of U.S. and other sunny areas throughout the world (demand can be highest when least available, e.g. winter solar heating)
  • Does require special materials for mirrors/panels that can affect environment
  • Current technology requires large amounts of land for small amounts of energy generation
Biomass
  • Industry in its infancy
  • Could create jobs because smaller plants would be used
  • Inefficient if small plants are used
  • Could be significant contributor to global warming because fuel has low heat content
Refuse Based Fuel
  • Fuel can have low cost
  • Could create jobs because smaller plants would be used
  • Low sulfur dioxide emissions
  • Inefficient if small plants are used
  • Could be significant contributor to global warming because fuel has low heat content
  • Flyash can contain metals as cadmium and lead
  • Contain dioxins and furans in air and ash releases
Hydrogen
  • Combines easily with oxygen to produce water and energy
  • Very costly to produce
  • Takes more energy to produce hydrogen then energy that could be recovered.
Fusion
  • Hydrogen and tritium could be used as fuel source
  • Higher energy output per unit mass than fission
  • Low radiation levels associated with process than fission-based reactors
  • Breakeven point has not been reached after ~40 years of expensive research